Her Facebook page, however, is still open so feel free to flood her page with criticism of her vile actions. However, I'm sure this is only because Facebook doesn't do the same thing Twitter does, at least, not easily.
But it poses the question as to whether she could be sued for not sharing her government social media posts with the general public, including her constituents. After all, Trump has been sued for blocking critics on Twitter.
In fact, I think people have a better case against Lauren Book than against Trump. You see, if Trump block you, you can still read and comment on his Tweets (just not directly to him). Simply log out of your account or just open an incognito window and go to Trump's Twitter page and you can read and screenshoot his Tweets. With Lauren Book, her Tweets are "protected," meaning that every follower HAS TO BE APPROVED MANUALLY before her Tweets can be read. Now, Facebook does not have simple blanket policy. You have to take a few steps to lock down your personal account. You are given the opinion to make posts publicly or for it to only be seen among friends. However, you don't have to be a friend on FB to see FB posts set for public viewing.
I'd like to see someone sue this self-righteous professional victim with no value as a legislator. No legislator should be able to pick and choose who hears their messages. If you can't stand the heat, snowflake, resign. District 32 needs a better representative who isn't hiding behind protections because she cannot stand criticism.
That ugly face is probably a reaction to even a passing criticism. What a snowflake. |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.